Deep in Thought
I just started reading "The Challenge of Jesus," by N.T. Wright. Beginning with the first chapter he has me deep in thought.
If N.T. Wright is on to something here, it has huge implications for how we present the gospel . . . Huge implications for how we lead someone to repentance . . . And huge implications for how we disciple followers of Jesus. I don't think the significance of this understanding of repentance could be overstated. It could . . . Well . . . Change everything . . . Even the world.
"Martin Luther rightly reacted against the medieval translation of metanoeite as paenitentiam agere ("do penance") and insisted that the word referred originally to the "repentance" that takes place deep within the human heart, not in the outward actions prescribed as a quasi-punishment. He could not know that his reading would be used, in turn, to support an individualistic and pietistic reading of Jesus' command to repent, which does no justice at all to the meaning of the word in the first century. Jesus was summoning his hearers to give up their whole way of life, their national and social agendas, and to trust him for a different agenda, a different set of goals. This of course included a change of heart, but went far beyond it." (p.27)
Thoughts?
If N.T. Wright is on to something here, it has huge implications for how we present the gospel . . . Huge implications for how we lead someone to repentance . . . And huge implications for how we disciple followers of Jesus. I don't think the significance of this understanding of repentance could be overstated. It could . . . Well . . . Change everything . . . Even the world.
"Martin Luther rightly reacted against the medieval translation of metanoeite as paenitentiam agere ("do penance") and insisted that the word referred originally to the "repentance" that takes place deep within the human heart, not in the outward actions prescribed as a quasi-punishment. He could not know that his reading would be used, in turn, to support an individualistic and pietistic reading of Jesus' command to repent, which does no justice at all to the meaning of the word in the first century. Jesus was summoning his hearers to give up their whole way of life, their national and social agendas, and to trust him for a different agenda, a different set of goals. This of course included a change of heart, but went far beyond it." (p.27)
Thoughts?
7 Comments:
I wish we all (and especially myself) knew more about Jesus' time and culture. I feel like we would understand Jesus better, as well as his commands, like repentance. I look forward to hearing more about the book -
I would discourage you from reading NT Wright. His books have left me deeply convicted and forced change in my life. He brought me ubruptly back to who Jesus is, a very unsafe place for me. Jon, I would enjoy connecting with you sometime.
Good job encouraging Brandi in her journey.
Jon,
I just recently finished it. The book doesn't get any easier or less convicting. I'd love to talk more about it as you get through it.
Hey Scott,
Thanks for the comment and for stopping by. I have thought about not reading the bible for the same reason, but my concience can't allow me to do that either, so I am just pretty much hosed! =) I would love to get together with you, drink coffee, and enjoy a good conversation.
Blessings-
Justin -- Would love to discuss some of NT Wright's thoughts with you.
I am captivated by Jesus. I am becoming so convinced that I have lost Jesus at times in my pursuit of Christianity. I will pick up a copy.
I would love to hear your thoughts as you read through it Andy.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home